Exponents, including the strange ones
Walk the powers of 2 downwards past zero and the meaning of $2^{0}$ and $2^{-3}$ is forced on you.
Writing as is only shorthand, and if that were all exponents were, they would need no lesson. The interesting question is what the shorthand ought to mean when the little number is zero, or negative, and there is nothing left to multiply.
Rather than being told, watch the pattern walk down past the point where the shorthand runs out.
Change the base from 2.0 to 10.0 and run it again. Then try 3.0. The value of the power at is the same in all three cases. What is it?
Reading upwards, every step multiplies by 2: 8, 16, 32, 64. So reading downwards, every step must divide by 2: 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, and then 1. That 1 is , and it did not come from a rule somebody invented. It is where the halving lands.
Keep halving. After 1 comes , which the output calls 0.5, and that is . Then , which is . A negative exponent is not a negative number and it never produces one; it is a division.
The definitions the pattern forces
For any real number that is not zero, and any positive whole number :
Zero is excluded because has no single sensible value and would be a division by zero. Every other real base is fine.
The five laws
All five come from the same observation: an exponent counts how many copies of the base are being multiplied, and multiplying two piles of copies together makes one bigger pile.
| Law | Why | Check |
|---|---|---|
| copies next to copies is copies | ||
| dividing cancels of the copies | ||
| copies of a pile of copies | ||
| the copies can be sorted into s and s | ||
| same sorting, for a quotient |
The laws hold for negative exponents too, which is the real reason the definitions above were chosen. Test a few at once and watch the two columns agree.
Change a = 3.0 to a = 0.5 and run it again, then to a = -2.0. The columns still agree. Now try a = 0.0 and see which lines break.
- Value at
- 4
- And
- 0.25
Set n to 2 and then to , and compare the two output lines each time. A negative exponent swaps the two of them over.
Two traps worth meeting on purpose
The first is about what a minus sign in front is attached to. An exponent binds more tightly than a minus sign, so means "take , then negate it", which is . Only squares the negative number, giving .
The first pair disagree and the second pair agree. In the last two lines change the exponent from 3 to 4, so both lines are fourth powers, and run it again. The agreement disappears. Work out which of the two lines changed sign and why.
The second trap is the belief that an exponent spreads across a sum the way it spreads across a product. It does not, and one pair of numbers is enough to prove it.
One row does have the two columns agreeing. Which one, and what is special about it? Add the pair (0, 7) and see whether it agrees too.
A worked example, every step
Simplify and leave no negative exponents in the answer.
- Deal with the bracket first. The outer hits every factor inside: , then , then .
- . For the letters, multiply the exponents: and .
- So the numerator is .
- Now divide by . The plain numbers give .
- Dividing subtracts exponents: , and .
- That leaves .
- Finally clear the negative exponent by moving to the bottom as : the answer is .
Scientific notation
A number is in scientific notation when it is written as one digit, then a decimal point, then the rest, all multiplied by a power of ten. Formally it is where is an integer and . The mass of the Earth is kilograms and the mass of an electron is kilograms.
The exponent says how far to move the decimal point: positive moves right and makes the number big, negative moves left and makes it small. Most languages write it with an e, so 5.97e24 is the same thing typed on a keyboard.
Change 9.11e-31 to 9.11e-310 and run it again, then to 9.11e-320. The printed value starts losing digits: there is a smallest size the machine can represent, which is exactly why the algebra is done on the exponents rather than on the digits.
Multiplying two such numbers is one law of exponents and one ordinary multiplication. Take . Multiply the fronts: . Add the exponents: . That gives , which is not yet in scientific notation because 12.8 is bigger than 10. Move the point one place left and add one to the exponent: .
Dividing works the same way with the other two laws: divide the fronts, and subtract the exponents. Here is one all the way through.
- The problem is . Split it into the fronts and the powers: .
- Divide the fronts: .
- Divide the powers by subtracting exponents: , so that part is . Subtracting a negative adds, which is where this step goes wrong most often.
- Put them back together: .
- Check that it is in scientific notation: the front is 4, and , so nothing needs moving.
- Sanity check the size. The top is a few hundred million, the bottom is about a thousandth, and dividing by a thousandth multiplies by a thousand, so an answer in the hundreds of billions is the right order of magnitude.
Write in scientific notation, and as an ordinary number.
. The point has to move four places to the right to sit after the 4, and moving right means the exponent is negative. For the second, moves the point four places right, giving .